and-or-ternary (PLR1706)#
Derived from the Pylint linter.
Warning: This rule has been removed and its documentation is only available for historical reasons.
Removal#
This rule was removed from Ruff because it was common for it to introduce behavioral changes. See #9007 for more information.
What it does#
Checks for uses of the known pre-Python 2.5 ternary syntax.
Why is this bad?#
Prior to the introduction of the if-expression (ternary) operator in Python
2.5, the only way to express a conditional expression was to use the and
and or
operators.
The if-expression construct is clearer and more explicit, and should be
preferred over the use of and
and or
for ternary expressions.
Example#
Use instead: